In two recent articles I’ve tried to map out the different types of egalitarian and the different types of complementarian. My aim in those articles has not been to argue for a specific position, not that I don’t have strong views or won’t argue for them but rather that I think it would be helpful top the long running debate simply for all of us to have a better map showing the lie of the land in the debate (yes I realise I’m jumping between metaphors there).
To that end, I thought a third compass might be helpful, one that helps us to see where we fit on the overall map, regardless of whether we consider ourselves egalitarian or complementarian. This might also help us to spot where there are surprising areas of agreement and well as crucial points of disagreement.
I would suggest that it looks like this.
The vertical axis looks at our perception of power or hierarchy v equality. Some people will emphasise a greater level of structure and hierarchy in life and some will see that as playing a significant part in understanding the roles of men and women in church and family. Others, however will argue that there isn’t meant to be much hierarchy in generally not between men and women.
The horizontal axis looks at our perception of gender. At one end of the spectrum, there is an emphasis on distinction, the argument that we can very clearly discern differences between male and female, that these are in effect ontological. We might particularly associate “wide complementarians” with this view, however there may well be many egalitarians who also recognise significant gender distinctions and argue that this is exactly why it is important that women are able to serve as ordained ministers in the church.
On the other hand, some will see the differences as minimal. It may be that they are thin complementarians arguing that beyond physical distinctions, the Bible doesn’t have much to say about Biblical manhood and womanhood. It may also include those from a feminist position who primarily see gender roles and distinctions as social constructions.
As with the other two compasses, you may find that you are someone along the spectrum on each axis. You may be surprised to discover where you land in comparison to others. I hope that you find these tools helpful as you seek to consider your own position and as you engage in conversation with others.
Faithroots 