I’ve recently published all my articles on the debate around whether desire and temptation are sin in one e-book. Here’s the introduction to that volume.
This little book started life as a series of articles for Faithroot.com in 2024. At the time a little controversy had begun to brew in conservative evangelical circles. Technically the debate was about recovering an old theological term and concept, that of “concupiscence.” However, there also was an edge to the debate. The specific applicatory focus was on whether or not there was a difference between sexual orientation and sexual practice. This very narrow focus on one area of desire and the technical nature of the debate between theologians made for what might be considered a bit of a minority sport and so it was a large debate in terms of the players it pulled in, the length of books, the number of articles and the passion with which people held their position and disparaged others. However, it didn’t really break into the mainstream of conservative evangelical conversation.
I engaged in the conversation for three reasons. First of all, when we strip out Latinate language about concupiscence and instead talk about sin, desire and temptation, the conversation becomes highly pertinent to pastoral life. Secondly, I thought that there was benefit in moving the debate away from that narrow focus on sexual orientation because surely those who are same sex attracted are not the only people who struggle with their desires. Thirdly, because as I read the literature, I became convinced that at least one side seemed quick to quote their opponents in a way that didn’t seem to fairly represent them. If they were struggling to represent contemporary interlocutors accurately, could we be confident in their ability to engage with historical authors and with Scripture well? The result was the articles that make up the chapters of this book.
The issue became a live one again in May 2026 with the sad news that Sam Allberry had resigned from ministry at Immanuel Nashville. Allberry had been a significant part of the creation of Living Out and had consistently argued for the distinction between orientation and behaviour. He resigned after an inappropriate relationship with another man came to light. Sadly, some interlocuters were quick to jump on this as ammunition for their side of the debate. This is disappointing because it replaces careful biblical exegesis with ad-hominem attacks.
I still want to keep the focus broad and practical because the pastoral relevance of a doctrine of sin and desire is for all believers. However, it is possible that this will serve as a primer for those wishing to better understand the background to that specific controversy.
You can download the full book for free to read.
Faithroots 