Are our views of right and wrong influenced by personality?

Photo by Helena Lopes on Pexels.com

My friend Steve Kneale writes here about how it’s relationships not arguments that win people over.  I think he has a good point here.  It’s not apologetic debating that will lead people to Christ. We may win the argument but not the person. In fact, what you tend to find is that if you prove… Continue reading Are our views of right and wrong influenced by personality?

Having the nature of sin

Photo by Sandeep Singh on Pexels.com

There’s an interesting little phrase in the Thirty Nine Articles, it appears in article 9 which discusses original sin.  In full, the article says: “Original sin standeth not in the following of Adam, (as the Pelagians do vainly talk;) but it is the fault and corruption of the Nature of every man, that naturally is… Continue reading Having the nature of sin

When a leader falls, is their past teaching still valid?”

This was the title of Tom Forryan’s article in Evangelicals Now, part of a series of articles on Jude. Disappointingly, the article doesn’t answer the question, although it poses it in the text as well as the headline.  Maybe that is due to the crucial section got cut in editing. The article’s focus is more… Continue reading When a leader falls, is their past teaching still valid?”

Why the debate about sin, temptation and desire matters

I’ve had four concerns about the debate around temptation, desire and sin (concupiscence). I wanted  to just pick up on three crucial implications from these. First of all, by narrowing the debate down to one application, the impression has been unfortunately given that this isn’t to do with all of us.  Rather, it only affects… Continue reading Why the debate about sin, temptation and desire matters

Really alive, really reborn

Photo by Sandeep Singh on Pexels.com

I revisited James 1:13 as part of my discussion on desire today.  It struck me that in that debate, we need to pay attention to what James says about how desire conceives and gives birth to sin which grows into death.  That statement should make us sit up and think carefully about what is going… Continue reading Really alive, really reborn

An alien interloper?

One of the key questions that has come up in the debate about sin, desire and temptation is whether or not we are responsible for our temptations.  This in fact is key to the position that Matthew Roberts and others hold.  The argument is that the desires which tempt us according to James are our… Continue reading An alien interloper?

“Tending towards…” – why I’m not about to become a Leeds United fan!

I’m a Bradford City supporter. Our nearest and greatest rivals are Leeds United.  Imagine if someone were to say that because I supported Bradford and that is near Leeds and that I don’t support Manchester United, then I am dangerously tending towards being a Leeds fan. You would recognise that for the nonsense it is.… Continue reading “Tending towards…” – why I’m not about to become a Leeds United fan!

Matthew Roberts and John Stevens debate sin, temptation and desire in Evangelicals Now: Initial reflections on Matthew’s article

Well, Matthew Roberts and John Stevens’ articles are now live on the Evangelicals Now website, should you choose to read them. Sadly, Matthew continues to repeat the same errors that I’ve already identified in his article.  In summary, Matthew sets out a position on sin which we would all agree with, namely that sin is a heart… Continue reading Matthew Roberts and John Stevens debate sin, temptation and desire in Evangelicals Now: Initial reflections on Matthew’s article